General processing speed (choice reaction time and figure matching) does not significantly predict mathematics achievement in Grade 7 or Grade 9¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the hierarchical regressions, choice reaction time and figure matching contributed no significant unique variance to mathematics achievement in either grade. → Cheng Dazhi 2022
Evidence¶
Cheng Dazhi 2022¶
Cheng Dazhi, Shi Kaihui, Wang Naiyi, Miao Xinyang, Zhou Xinlin. (2022). Examining the Differential Role of General and Specific Processing Speed in Predicting Mathematical Achievement in Junior High School. Journal of Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10010001
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Table 2 of the hierarchical regression models shows the general processing speed steps: choice reaction time ΔR² values of 0.009, 0.008, 0.003, 0.003, 0.000, and 0.007 across Grade 7 and Grade 9 mathematics, Chinese, and English, none reaching the Bonferroni-corrected threshold; figure matching reached significance only for Chinese. Equivalence was not tested.
"Step 5 Choice reaction time 0.009 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.000 0.007"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Neither numerosity processing nor figure matching predicts general mathematical achievement — related
- The prediction power of specific processing speed for mathematics decreases with reduced arithmetic fluency: complex multiplication did not predict mathematics although it predicted Chinese and English — related
- Specific processing speed measured at the start of Grade 7 predicts mathematics achievement on the high school entrance examination at the end of Grade 9 — related
- Inattention is the only psychopathology symptom dimension associated with slow processing speed, and it does not explain the associations with ASD or psychosis — related
- Numerical magnitude comparison explains significant unique variance in multiplication fact performance over and above phonological processing, intellectual ability, and general reaction time — related
- Specific processing speed (reading fluency and simple/complex subtraction fluency) makes a significant unique contribution to Grade 7 mathematics achievement after controlling for age, gender, and general cognitive abilities — related
- Kindergarten visual processing uniquely predicts grade-one early mathematics after controlling for prior mathematics and general cognitive abilities — related
- Specific processing speed generalises beyond mathematics, significantly predicting Chinese and English achievement in both Grade 7 and Grade 9 — related
- Figure-matching ability accounts for the association between numerosity processing and computational fluency in third- to fifth-grade children — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
general-processing-speed-does-not-predict-math |
title |
General processing speed (choice reaction time and figure matching) does not significantly predict mathematics achievement in Grade 7 or Grade 9 |
description |
General processing speed (choice reaction time and figure matching) does not significantly predict mathematics achievement in Grade 7 or Grade 9 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — cheng-dazhi-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.