Arousal showed a positive relationship with final high school mathematics grade when controlling for the other test anxiety facets¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the ordinal regression on mathematics grade, arousal was positively related to grade while worry did not explain unique variance. → Schillinger 2021
Evidence¶
Schillinger 2021¶
Schillinger, F. L., Mosbacher, J. A., Brunner, C., Vogel, S. E., & Grabner, R. H. (2021). Revisiting the Role of Worries in Explaining the Link Between Test Anxiety and Test Performance. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09601-0
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Ordinal regression predicting self-reported final high school mathematics grade from the four PAF facets (710 students reported a grade; the three reporting the lowest grade were excluded from analyses involving grades); arousal estimate E = 0.06, z = 2.92, p = .003; test anxiety accounted for approximately 2% of variance (R2McFadden = 0.02).
"Students reporting higher arousal in test situations received a better grade in mathematics than students reporting lower arousal when controlling for the other facets of test anxiety. Again, worry did not explain unique variance in students' mathematics grade."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Academic Anxiety — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Affect Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Worry did not explain unique variance in students' test performance or mathematics grade, challenging the worry-based explanation of the test anxiety-performance link — related
- Interference and lack of confidence, but not worry or arousal, explain unique variance in university students' standardized test performance — reports the opposite
- No evidence for a curvilinear relationship between arousal and test performance — related
- The present results replicate Donati et al.'s (2019) finding that interference and lack of confidence, but not worry, relate to arithmetic test performance, extending it to unique variance and domain-general intelligence — related
- Interference and lack of confidence correlated negatively with all performance measures, whereas worry and arousal showed selective, weaker bivariate correlations — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
arousal-positive-mathematics-grade |
title |
Arousal showed a positive relationship with final high school mathematics grade when controlling for the other test anxiety facets |
description |
Arousal showed a positive relationship with final high school mathematics grade when controlling for the other test anxiety facets |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — schillinger-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.