The average improvement index for Arthur in English language development is +11 percentile points, ranging from –5 to +17 across findings¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Across the three English language development outcomes, the WWC computed a domain average effect size of 0.29 (ns) and an average improvement index of +11 percentile points, with a range of –5 to +17. → Arthur (WWC Intervention Report) 2006
Evidence¶
Arthur (WWC Intervention Report) 2006¶
Arthur (WWC Intervention Report). (2006). What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. http://pbskids.org/arthur/index.html
q3 · i1 · causal · r?
WWC calculations across the Uchikoshi randomized controlled trial's three outcomes (combined narrative measure, total number of words, mean clause length) yield a domain average effect size of 0.29, ns, corresponding to the +11 average improvement index. The improvement index is "entirely based on the size of the effect, regardless of the statistical significance."
"The average improvement index is +11 percentile points, with a range of –5 to +17 percentile points across findings, for the English language development domain."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- English-Learner Status — outcome: instruction changes it
- Oral Language — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Peer Tutoring and Response Groups has positive effects on English language development for English language learners, with an average improvement index of +17 percentile points — related
- Enhanced Proactive Reading shows no discernible effects on English language development — related
- The WWC rates Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs as having potentially positive effects on reading achievement and English language development — related
- Mean clause length showed a small negative difference favoring the comparison group, not statistically significant — related
- Watching Arthur improves English narrative skill development in kindergarten English language learners more than an alternative educational program (potentially positive effects) — related
- The supporting evidence is a randomized controlled trial in which 108 kindergarten English learners watched 54 episodes of Arthur or Between the Lions over one school year — related
- The WWC improvement index is +31 percentile points for English language development and +3 percentile points for reading achievement — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
arthur-improvement-index-plus-11 |
title |
The average improvement index for Arthur in English language development is +11 percentile points, ranging from –5 to +17 across findings |
description |
The average improvement index for Arthur in English language development is +11 percentile points, ranging from –5 to +17 across findings |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — arthur-wwc-intervention-report-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.