Claims

The WWC rates Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs as having potentially positive effects on reading achievement and English language development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Based on two studies meeting standards with reservations, the WWC found potentially positive effects on reading achievement (average improvement index +29 percentile points, range +24 to +33) and English language development (+23, range +21 to +24). → What Works Clearinghouse 2006

Evidence

What Works Clearinghouse 2006

What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs — WWC Intervention Report. http://crede.berkeley.edu/research/crede/research/llaa/1.5pubs.html

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Systematic WWC synthesis of two studies (one randomized controlled trial, one quasi-experiment), both meeting evidence standards with reservations. The rating fell short of "positive effects" because no study met standards for a strong design; no studies showed negative effects. The average reading achievement improvement index was +29 percentile points and English language development +23.

"Based on these two studies, the WWC found the intervention to have potentially positive effects on reading achievement and potentially positive effects on English language development."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ic-ll-potentially-positive-wwc-rating
title The WWC rates Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs as having potentially positive effects on reading achievement and English language development
description The WWC rates Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs as having potentially positive effects on reading achievement and English language development
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2006
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2006

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.