The WWC rates Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs as having potentially positive effects on reading achievement and English language development¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Based on two studies meeting standards with reservations, the WWC found potentially positive effects on reading achievement (average improvement index +29 percentile points, range +24 to +33) and English language development (+23, range +21 to +24). → What Works Clearinghouse 2006
Evidence¶
What Works Clearinghouse 2006¶
What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs — WWC Intervention Report. http://crede.berkeley.edu/research/crede/research/llaa/1.5pubs.html
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?
Systematic WWC synthesis of two studies (one randomized controlled trial, one quasi-experiment), both meeting evidence standards with reservations. The rating fell short of "positive effects" because no study met standards for a strong design; no studies showed negative effects. The average reading achievement improvement index was +29 percentile points and English language development +23.
"Based on these two studies, the WWC found the intervention to have potentially positive effects on reading achievement and potentially positive effects on English language development."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Some classroom discussion approaches improve text comprehension, but gains are not uniform across approaches and more student talk alone does not produce them — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- The WWC improvement index is +31 percentile points for English language development and +3 percentile points for reading achievement — related
- The WWC rates Reading Mastery as having potentially positive effects on the reading achievement of English language learners — related
- Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs produce statistically significant positive effects on factual and interpretive story comprehension in a short-term randomized trial with English language learners — related
- Peer Tutoring and Response Groups has positive effects on English language development for English language learners, with an average improvement index of +17 percentile points — related
- The WWC rates Project CRISS® as having potentially positive effects on comprehension for adolescent learners, with an average improvement index of +20 percentile points — related
- Growth Mindset interventions have potentially positive effects on postsecondary academic achievement (improvement index +13) — related
- The average improvement index for PALS on reading achievement for English language learners is +12 percentile points, ranging from +5 to +25 across findings — related
- The average improvement index for Arthur in English language development is +11 percentile points, ranging from –5 to +17 across findings — related
- When implemented alone, neither Literature Logs nor Instructional Conversations produced statistically significant comprehension effects, in contrast to the combined intervention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ic-ll-potentially-positive-wwc-rating |
title |
The WWC rates Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs as having potentially positive effects on reading achievement and English language development |
description |
The WWC rates Instructional Conversations and Literature Logs as having potentially positive effects on reading achievement and English language development |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.