Two of three students with ASD declined in word problem solving performance from pretest to posttest after the intervention¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? At posttest, Annie increased from 20% to 30%, but Joey decreased from 80% to 70% and Bobby decreased from 45% to 30%. → Delisio 2018
Evidence¶
Delisio 2018¶
Delisio, L. A., Bukaty, C. A., & Taylor, M. (2018). Effects of a Graphic Organizer Intervention Package on the Mathematics Word Problem Solving Abilities of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1185372
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive statistics for the three students with ASD due to small sample size. The article reports Annie increased to "30%", Joey decreased to "70%", and Bobby decreased to "30%" at posttest.
"At posttest, Annie increased to a score of 30%, Joey decreased to a score of 70%, and Bobby decreased to a scored of 30%."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The K-N-W-S graphic organizer intervention package did not produce statistically significant pretest-to-posttest gains in word problem solving for students with disabilities in the treatment group — related
- TTPS intervention students improved their problem-solving performance from pretest to posttest while comparison students did not — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.