Claims

TTPS intervention students improved their problem-solving performance from pretest to posttest while comparison students did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Intervention students performed better on the problem-solving posttest than the pretest (d = .48), whereas comparison students did not improve. → Bostic et al. 2016

Evidence

Bostic et al. 2016

Jonathan D. Bostic, Stephen J. Pape, Tim Jacobbe. (2016). Encouraging Sixth-Grade Students' Problem-Solving Performance by Teaching Through Problem Solving. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, Volume 8, Number 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094896

q3 · i2 · causal · r1

Repeated measures t-tests on a one-month teaching experiment with 18 intervention and 40 comparison students. The intervention group's gain was statistically significant with "d = .48", while the comparison group's pre-post change was not significant.

"Students in the intervention group performed better on the problem-solving posttest than the pretest, t(17) = 2.65, p = .02, d = .48, whereas their peers in the comparison group did not improve, t(39) = 0.52, p = .61"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.