Participants showed robust implicit statistical learning and general skill learning on the ASRT task in both studies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-26 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In both studies, reaction times were faster for high-probability than low-probability triplets, indicating implicit SL, and RTs decreased across blocks, indicating general skill learning. → Pedraza 2024
Evidence¶
Pedraza 2024¶
Pedraza, F., Farkas, B. C., Vékony, T., Haesebaert, F., Phelipon, R., Mihalecz, I., Janacsek, K., Anders, R., Tillmann, B., Plancher, G. & Németh, D. (2024). Evidence for a competitive relationship between executive functions and statistical learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00243-9
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Linear mixed model on block-wise median RTs in Study 1's 25-block ASRT task (n = 186). The quote reports the significant Triplet Type main effect; Study 2 showed a parallel effect (F(1,13810.00) = 1289.09, p < 0.001).
"The model resulted in a statistically significant main effect of Triplet Type (F (1,8924) = 83.53, p < 0.001), with faster reaction times for high-probability triplets t han for low-probability triplets"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Executive ability affected general skill learning in Study 2 but not Study 1, and affected overall implicit SL rather than the learning trajectory — related
- At the task level, implicit SL correlates negatively with most individual executive-function measures, strongest with verbal fluency tasks — related
- Implicit statistical learning is negatively correlated with a latent executive-function factor comprising verbal fluency and complex working memory in Study 1 — related
- Study 2 replicates the negative SL–EF factor 1 correlation while EF factor 2 (short-term memory) shows no association with implicit SL — related
- A fixed-effect meta-analysis pooling both studies yields a pooled negative correlation of r = -0.115 between EF factor scores and implicit SL — related
- High-order rule learning in the long ASRT task increases during rest periods and decreases during practice — related
- Statistical learning in the ASRT task increases during practice periods and decreases during rest periods — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
asrt-implicit-sl-robust-both-studies |
title |
Participants showed robust implicit statistical learning and general skill learning on the ASRT task in both studies |
description |
Participants showed robust implicit statistical learning and general skill learning on the ASRT task in both studies |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-26 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pedraza-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.