A fixed-effect meta-analysis pooling both studies yields a pooled negative correlation of r = -0.115 between EF factor scores and implicit SL¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 The continuously cumulating meta-analysis pooled effect size was negative and significantly different from zero (r = -0.115, p = 0.035), with near-zero heterogeneity. → Pedraza 2024
Evidence¶
Pedraza 2024¶
Pedraza, F., Farkas, B. C., Vékony, T., Haesebaert, F., Phelipon, R., Mihalecz, I., Janacsek, K., Anders, R., Tillmann, B., Plancher, G. & Németh, D. (2024). Evidence for a competitive relationship between executive functions and statistical learning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00243-9
q3 · i1 · associational · r2
Fixed-effect meta-analytic model pooling the two studies' correlations between EF factor scores and implicit SL. The quote reports "r = −0.115, 95% CI = [-0.218, -0.008], p = 0.035"; heterogeneity variance was τ2 = 0 with I2 of 0% and non-significant Cochran's Q.
"The pooled effect size was negative and significantly different from zero, r = −0.115, 95% CI = [-0.218, -0.008], p = 0.035 (Fig. 6). The weights of Study 1 and Study 2 in the pooled effect were 54.3% and 45.7%, respectively."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Executive ability affected general skill learning in Study 2 but not Study 1, and affected overall implicit SL rather than the learning trajectory — related
- Implicit statistical learning is negatively correlated with a latent executive-function factor comprising verbal fluency and complex working memory in Study 1 — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Study 2 replicates the negative SL–EF factor 1 correlation while EF factor 2 (short-term memory) shows no association with implicit SL — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- At the task level, implicit SL correlates negatively with most individual executive-function measures, strongest with verbal fluency tasks — related
- Participants showed robust implicit statistical learning and general skill learning on the ASRT task in both studies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sl-ef-pooled-meta-analysis |
title |
A fixed-effect meta-analysis pooling both studies yields a pooled negative correlation of r = -0.115 between EF factor scores and implicit SL |
description |
A fixed-effect meta-analysis pooling both studies yields a pooled negative correlation of r = -0.115 between EF factor scores and implicit SL |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pedraza-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.