Assessment of young multilingual learners is hampered by a dearth of valid, linguistically appropriate measures and by English-only administration¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Research widely recommends nonstandardized assessments such as portfolios, language samples, holistic observations, and authentic performance-based assessments, conducted across varied content areas and contexts. → Burr 2022
Evidence¶
Burr 2022¶
Burr, E., & Burho, J. (2022). Resourcing supports for young multilingual learners with suspected disabilities in California: Learning collaborative recommendations. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED655645
q2 · i? · review · r2
The report states that "research widely recommends the use of nonstandardized assessments," listing portfolios, language samples, holistic observations, and authentic performance-based assessments, ideally across varied contexts (Farnsworth, 2018).
"research widely recommends the use of nonstandardized assessments, such as portfolios, language samples, holistic classroom observations, narrative analysis, curriculum-based assessments, and authentic performance-based assessments (Farnsworth, 2018)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The authors assert that innovative assessment measures capture POG competencies more fully than traditional standardized tests — a broader claim this one bears on
- Systems constraints on pre-referral include lack of appropriate observation tools, over-identification fears, and COVID-19 effects — related
- Bilingual staff help differentiate typical language development from disability, but interviewees described no systematic process for doing so — related
- Narrow, skills-only KEAs can narrow the kindergarten curriculum and foster inappropriate teaching, while holistic observational assessment can drive developmentally appropriate practice — related
- The portfolio adds context to holistic review that readers say helps level the playing field for applicants from under-resourced high schools — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- It is inappropriate to use KEA scores to evaluate teachers or preschool programs, hold children back from kindergarten, or diagnose learning disabilities — related
- Learning behaviors of typical multilingual development can resemble those of disability, complicating accurate identification — related
- State assessment design decisions inevitably shape classroom instruction, often narrowing curriculum and teaching practices — related
- Educators' efforts to support SEL are hampered by a lack of available, unbiased measures of related competencies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
assessment-barriers-young-multilingual-learners |
title |
Assessment of young multilingual learners is hampered by a dearth of valid, linguistically appropriate measures and by English-only administration |
description |
Assessment of young multilingual learners is hampered by a dearth of valid, linguistically appropriate measures and by English-only administration |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — burr-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.