Claims

ASSET is the most commonly used global rating scale for arthroscopic skills assessment, used in 10 of the reviewed studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Among six types of GRS reported, the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool was the most frequently used (10 studies), followed by BAKSSS (three studies). → Zhou Haixia 2022

Evidence

Zhou Haixia 2022

Zhou Haixia, Xian Chengyao, Zhang Kai-Jun, Yang Zhouwen, Li Wei, Tian Jing. (2022). The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085317

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Frequency analysis of subjective tools across the 28 included studies. Six types of GRS were reported; ASSET led with 10 studies, BAKSSS followed with three, and other GRS appeared in one study each.

"The most commonly used GRS for assessment was the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (10 studies) [32,33,36–40,43,45,46], followed by Basic Arthroscopy Knee Skill Scoring System (three studies)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.