Completion time is the most common objective metric in arthroscopic skills training assessment, reported in 21 of 28 reviewed studies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Across 28 included studies, completion time was the most frequently reported objective measurement outcome (21 studies, 75.0%). → Zhou Haixia 2022

Evidence¶

Zhou Haixia 2022¶

Zhou Haixia, Xian Chengyao, Zhang Kai-Jun, Yang Zhouwen, Li Wei, Tian Jing. (2022). The frequency of assessment tools in arthroscopic training: a systematic review. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2085317

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review of 28 primary studies on arthroscopic training assessment. Frequency analysis of objective metrics found "completion time, reported in 21 studies (75.0%)"; instrument path length appeared in nine studies (32.1%).

"A variety of objective metrics was used in the included studies. The most common measurement outcome was completion time, reported in 21 studies (75.0%)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Most studies (60.7%) of arthroscopic skills training combined objective metrics with subjective assessment scales — related
• Objective metrics are used more frequently in simulated environments, while GRS and checklists are used with actual patients — related
• ASSET is the most commonly used global rating scale for arthroscopic skills assessment, used in 10 of the reviewed studies — related
• Completion time detects training gains only in less experienced trainees, per the review's account of Kim et al. — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• VR-trained and bench-top-trained subjects showed no objective performance difference but a significant GRS difference on a final VR simulator assessment — a narrower finding that bears on this claim