Claims

Teachers used ASSISTments reports to adjust instruction and make problem review more frequent, targeted, and data driven

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 92 percent of teachers reviewed at least half of assignment reports; after reviewing a report teachers adjusted teaching plans on 46.2% of logged days, most commonly reteaching topics and filling learning gaps (65.8% of changes). → Feng 2025 q2 i? 74.1% of teachers used ASSISTments reports to determine which problems to review, and 89.7% projected reports for the class, supporting anonymized whole-class discussion of common errors. → Feng 2025 (2)

Evidence

Feng 2025

Feng, M., Li, L., Brezack, N., & Schneider, M. (2025). Scaling teachers' professional development for ASSISTments companion report: Implementation analysis of the ASSISTments intervention. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED677784

q2 · i? · design · r2

Triangulation of system use data, instructional logs, and post-intervention survey for Step 3 of the four-step routine. The article reports teachers used reports to reteach topics (65.8% of changes), select individual students (32.4%), or groups (20.0%).

"92 percent of teachers reviewed at least half of the ASSISTments assignment reports for their classes (system data)"

Feng 2025 (2)

Feng, M., Li, L., Brezack, N., & Schneider, M. (2025). Scaling teachers' professional development for ASSISTments companion report: Implementation analysis of the ASSISTments intervention. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED677784

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post-intervention survey and log data for Step 4. The article states projecting anonymized reports can "help make the class discussion more inclusive, build a culture of collective learning," and may specifically benefit lower-performing students.

"Many teachers (74.1%, post-intervention survey) indicated that they used ASSISTments reports to determine which problems to review. Teachers also frequently projected these reports for the class— 89.7 percent reported doing so during the school year"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id assistments-data-driven-review-instructional-adjustment
title Teachers used ASSISTments reports to adjust instruction and make problem review more frequent, targeted, and data driven
description Teachers used ASSISTments reports to adjust instruction and make problem review more frequent, targeted, and data driven
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — feng-2025, feng-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.