High-dosage tutoring, frequent teacher feedback and coaching, and data-driven instructional practices show moderately strong evidence of association with charter-school achievement impacts¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Moderately strong evidence links high-dosage tutoring, frequent feedback and coaching for teachers, and data-guided instructional practices to positive charter-school achievement impacts. → Philip M. Gleason 2017
Evidence¶
Philip M. Gleason 2017¶
Philip M. Gleason. (2017). What's the Secret Ingredient? Searching for Policies and Practices That Make Charter Schools Successful. Journal of School Choice. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/ja-whats-the-secret-ingredient-searching-for-policies-and-practices-that-make-charter-schools doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1395620
q2 · i? · review · r?
The summary characterizes the evidence for these three practices as "moderately strong," reporting a positive association with charter schools' achievement impacts. No effect sizes are printed.
"In addition, moderately strong evidence suggests that high-dosage tutoring, frequent feedback and coaching for teachers, and policies promoting the use of data to guide teachers' instructional practices are positively associated with charter schools' achievement impacts."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Time and Continuity — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- CMOs with the greatest positive impact on student achievement were most likely to use an intense approach to monitoring and coaching teachers — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Personalized Learning Effects Vary With Fidelity — related
- Assignment to BookNook tutoring produces a small but statistically significant increase in reading growth on the NWEA MAP for grade 1-4 students — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Students receiving the recommended BookNook dosage of 20 or more sessions show markedly stronger reading gains (ES = +0.26) than the overall assigned sample — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teachers play a key role in determining students' success in school districts and CMOs — related
- Urban charter schools have more positive impacts on student achievement than other charter schools — related
- Policies promoting data use to guide teachers' instructional practices are positively associated with charter school achievement impacts — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- High-dosage tutoring is positively associated with charter school achievement impacts — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Frequent feedback and coaching for teachers is positively associated with charter school achievement impacts — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Urban charter schools and charters serving low-achieving, low-income students show the strongest positive achievement impacts — related
- High dosage tutoring can produce accelerated academic growth for academically at-risk students if implemented effectively and at proper scale — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Schools where students and teachers reported frequent use of standards-aligned practices showed stronger assessment gains than schools with few reports of frequent use — related
- High-dosage tutoring directly tied to classroom content can substantially accelerate learning in math and reading for the most struggling students — related
- Teachers used ASSISTments reports to adjust instruction and make problem review more frequent, targeted, and data driven — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Long Beach schools with assigned math coaches showed markedly and disproportionately rising CAASPP scores, though causation could not be tied to coaching — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A district math administrator reported that schools supported by coaches with mathematics expertise showed greater gains and stronger collaborative structures than schools without such support — related
- Scenario-based tutor lessons produced a significant pooled 7.4% learning gain, driven by three lessons with established construct validity while three newer lessons showed no significant gains — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A practitioner review reports a meta-analysis of causal coaching studies as finding positive effects of coaching on teachers' instructional practice and student achievement, though one contrasting study found coached teachers no more effective — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tutoring-coaching-data-use-charter-impacts |
title |
High-dosage tutoring, frequent teacher feedback and coaching, and data-driven instructional practices show moderately strong evidence of association with charter-school achievement impacts |
description |
High-dosage tutoring, frequent teacher feedback and coaching, and data-driven instructional practices show moderately strong evidence of association with charter-school achievement impacts |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — philip-m-gleason-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.