Per-participant implementation costs fall substantially in leaner implementation models without a warm-up year or local coach¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Sensitivity tests estimate per-participant costs of $17.85 (2 years, no local coach), $25.86 (no warm-up), and $8.85 (no warm-up, no local coach), versus $46.23 in the primary scenario. → Feng 2024
Evidence¶
Feng 2024¶
Feng, M., Weiser, G., & Collins, K. (2024). Cost and cost effectiveness of ASSISTments online math support: Analysis from a randomized controlled study in middle school. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED655721
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Sensitivity analysis (Table 2) varying length of professional development, availability of a local coach, and necessity of a warm-up year; the developer expected satisfactory implementation might be achieved with only one year of professional development.
"The primary costs in Table 1 reflect that costs during both years of implementation were the essential ingredients for producing the observed differences during the study in math outcomes between students in the classrooms of intervention teachers and the students in the classrooms of comparison teachers."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The cost-effectiveness ratio of ASSISTments is approximately $462.30 per student per standard deviation of long-term math achievement gain — related
- Implementing ASSISTments above business-as-usual cost about $207,794 across the study, or about $46.23 per student — related
- Teachers with a local coach completed far more of the intended Write to Succeed professional learning activities than teachers without one — related
- Bulk negotiation with the Kahoot! provider reduced the per-teacher price from $149.99 to $44.60, saving the district over $25,000 on licenses — related
- NBA Math Hoops can be implemented at low marginal cost: $17.85 per pupil (analytic sample) in materials and training beyond typical summer programming, yielding 0.19 SD math gain — related
- Districts' costs for using Ecree depend on implementation and support needs, and the price per student would likely be lower for larger districts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
assistments-sensitivity-lower-cost-scenarios |
title |
Per-participant implementation costs fall substantially in leaner implementation models without a warm-up year or local coach |
description |
Per-participant implementation costs fall substantially in leaner implementation models without a warm-up year or local coach |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — feng-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.