Attention bids were significantly more likely to succeed with the augmented toy (68% vs 52% success)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 Attention bids were significantly more likely to succeed in the AKC than the KC condition, F(1, 28) = 7.99, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.22. → Yuill N 2014

Evidence¶

Yuill N 2014¶

Yuill N, Hinske S, Williams SE and Leith G (2014) How getting noticed helps getting on: successful attention capture doubles children's cooperative play. Front. Psychol. 5:418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00418

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Study 2 attention-bid coding of a 7-minute segment of the first session: repeated-measures ANOVA with playset between subjects and bid outcome within subjects, effect size η2 = 0.22; "In the AKC, there was a 68% chance of an attention bid being successful, compared to 52% with the KC."

"attention bids were significantly more likely to succeed in the AKC than in the KC condition, [F(1, 28) = 7.99, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.22, power = 0.78]"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The augmentation effect on cooperative play replicated in Study 2, with a large playset-by-behavior interaction and no overlap in confidence intervals
• An audio-augmented toy produced significantly longer cooperative play than the same toy without augmentation in triads of 6- to 11-year-olds — related
• Groups with the augmented toy used more balanced narrative roles, with more narrator and fewer metanarrator utterances — related