Claims

Public speaking anxiety is associated with poorer judged speech performance only among individuals low in attentional control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The negative association between measured public speaking anxiety and judged speech quality is statistically significant only at low levels of attentional control (ACS values of 2.59 or less); anxiety was measured, not manipulated, so this is a moderated association, not a causal effect. → Jones Christopher R. 2012 q3 i? The negative association between measured public speaking anxiety and speech length is statistically significant only at low levels of attentional control (ACS values at or lower than 2.60), with a marginal interaction (p < .06). → Jones Christopher R. 2012 (2)

Evidence

Jones Christopher R. 2012

Jones Christopher R., Fazio Russell H., Vasey Michael W. (2012). Attentional Control Buffers the Effect of Public Speaking Anxiety on Performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430166

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Regression analysis in the Results section of a two-session study of 61 undergraduates who gave a three-minute videotaped speech. Mean-centered ACS, PRCS, and their interaction predicted judges' ratings of speech quality. The interaction was significant, "b = .17, t(57) = 2.41, p = .02", and Johnson-Neyman probing showed the anxiety slope was negative and significant only at low ACS. Anxiety and attentional control were measured as individual differences, so the study shows an association, not that anxiety causes poorer performance.

"On the primary dependent variable, judges’ ratings of speech quality, an interaction between ACS and PRCS was obtained: b = .17, t(57) = 2.41, p = .02."

Jones Christopher R. 2012 (2)

Jones Christopher R., Fazio Russell H., Vasey Michael W. (2012). Attentional Control Buffers the Effect of Public Speaking Anxiety on Performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430166

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Regression analysis in the Results section predicting seconds of speech from mean-centered ACS, PRCS, and their interaction in the same 61-participant sample. The interaction was marginal, "b = 3.25, t(57) = 1.92, p < .06", and probing showed the negative association of anxiety with speech length was significant only at ACS values at or below 2.60. Both predictors were measured, not manipulated, so this is not a causal effect.

"An interaction emerged between ACS and PRCS: b = 3.25, t(57) = 1.92, p < .06 (see Figure 2)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id attentional-control-buffers-speech-anxiety-performance
title Public speaking anxiety is associated with poorer judged speech performance only among individuals low in attentional control
description Public speaking anxiety is associated with poorer judged speech performance only among individuals low in attentional control
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — jones-christopher-r-2012, jones-christopher-r-2012-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.