Claims

Attributional feedback raises self-efficacy and performance, with ability versus effort feedback credibility depending on learners' capabilities and timing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Ability feedback enhanced post-instructional self-efficacy and performance better than effort feedback or combined ability-plus-effort feedback in Schunk's (1983a) subtraction study. → Schunk 1995 q3 i? For learners with severe reading deficiencies, later ability feedback produced better ability attributions and efficacy than early ability feedback. → Schunk 1995 (2)

Evidence

Schunk 1995

Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137. http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Experiment during a subtraction instruction program in which children periodically received feedback linking performance with ability, effort, or both. All three conditions raised motivation equally; ability-plus-effort subjects may have discounted ability information.

"Ability feedback enhanced post-instructional self-efficacy and performance better than effort feedback or ability-plus-effort feedback."

Schunk 1995 (2)

Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137. http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Study of children with severe reading deficiencies during reading comprehension instruction; comprehension success was limited early, so ability feedback for early successes may not have been credible.

"Schunk and Rice (1986) found during reading comprehension instruction that later ability feedback exerted better effects on ability attributions and efficacy than did early ability feedback."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id attributional-feedback-credibility-effort-ability
title Attributional feedback raises self-efficacy and performance, with ability versus effort feedback credibility depending on learners' capabilities and timing
description Attributional feedback raises self-efficacy and performance, with ability versus effort feedback credibility depending on learners' capabilities and timing
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1995
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — schunk-1995, schunk-1995-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.