Cognitive modeling raised division skill more than didactic instruction while both raised self-efficacy equally, with self-efficacy mediating treatment effects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Schunk's (1981) long-division experiment, cognitive modeling and didactic instruction raised self-efficacy equally, but modeling produced greater skill gains and more accurate efficacy judgments. → Schunk 1995
Evidence¶
Schunk 1995¶
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137. http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/
q3 · i? · review · r2
Experiment with low-achieving children in a long-division instructional program comparing cognitive modeling with didactic instruction; skill, persistence, and self-efficacy were assessed before and after instruction. Didactic subjects "tended to overestimate what they could do."
"Cognitive modeling and didactic instruction raised self-efficacy equally well; however, modeling led to greater gains in division skill and to more accurate perceptions of capabilities"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Attributional feedback raises self-efficacy and performance, with ability versus effort feedback credibility depending on learners' capabilities and timing — related
- Peer models raised self-efficacy and skill better than teacher models, but model-competence findings conflict across studies — related
- Self-efficacy judgments correspond less well to behavior in learning settings than in performance settings — related
- Peer instruction is less effective than explicit teacher creativity teaching for lower-level students — reports the opposite
- Self-efficacy correlates positively with subsequent motivation and performance across cognitive and sport domains — related
- Proximal goals and ability attributional feedback for early learning raise self-efficacy more than distant goals and effort feedback, by a review's report of earlier studies — related
- Proximal goals produced higher motivation, skill, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest than distant or general goals — related
- Self-modeling raised self-efficacy for learning, motivation, and posttest skill among below-grade-level children — related
- Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, less metacognitively accurate, and overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cognitive-modeling-versus-didactic-instruction-division |
title |
Cognitive modeling raised division skill more than didactic instruction while both raised self-efficacy equally, with self-efficacy mediating treatment effects |
description |
Cognitive modeling raised division skill more than didactic instruction while both raised self-efficacy equally, with self-efficacy mediating treatment effects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1995 |
source_checked |
2026-10-19 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — schunk-1995 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.