Individual differences in audience effects are not correlated with self-reported resistance to peer influence¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? None of the significant audience effects from the main analysis correlated with participants' RPI scores. → Wolf L.K. 2015

Evidence¶

Wolf L.K. 2015¶

Wolf L.K., Bazargani N., Kilford E.J., Dumontheil I., Blakemore S.-J. (2015). The audience effect in adolescence depends on who's looking over your shoulder. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.003

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Correlation analysis within the same experiment relating the resistance to peer influence questionnaire (α = 0.65) to the significant audience effects. No correlation reached significance (ps > 0.3); no effect sizes are printed, so the null is reported without an equivalence claim.

"To investigate whether audience effects within age groups were related to differences in RPI we correlated this measure with the significant differences in audience effects. However, none of the significant effects from the main analysis was correlated with RPI scores (ps > 0.3)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Neural audience effects do not correlate with behavioural audience effects or resistance-to-peer-influence scores — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• A peer audience decreases accuracy in the complex relational integration condition in both adolescents and adults — related