Neural audience effects do not correlate with behavioural audience effects or resistance-to-peer-influence scores¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? No significant clusters correlated the behavioural audience effect on accuracy, or participants' RPI scores, with neural audience effects. → Dumontheil Iroise 2016

Evidence¶

Dumontheil Iroise 2016¶

Dumontheil Iroise, Wolf Laura K., Blakemore Sarah-Jayne. (2016). Audience effects on the neural correlates of relational reasoning in adolescence. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.001

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Correlation analyses across the whole fMRI sample tested whether individual differences in the neural Peer>Alone effect related to the accuracy audience effect or to resistance-to-peer-influence questionnaire scores; neither analysis found significant clusters, so the neural and behavioural audience effects were dissociated.

"No significant clusters were found in this analysis. In a second analysis, we found there were no significant clusters in the Peer>Alone contrast that correlated with the RPI scores of participants."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Individual differences in audience effects are not correlated with self-reported resistance to peer influence — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• A peer audience differentially modulates fronto-parietal activation by age: increased in adolescents, decreased in adults — related