Claims

Authentic use of authentic materials motivated learners more than traditional teaching of the same materials

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Learner feedback indicated that watching subtitled video clips (authentic use) was more motivating than traditional teaching of the same subtitle vocabulary. → Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad 2016

Evidence

Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad 2016

Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad. (2016). Short-term and Long-term Retention of Vocabulary through Authentic Subtitled Videos. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.5p.14

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation based on learner feedback reported in the Discussion; both groups were described as highly motivated, but the authentic-use group more so. No motivation instrument or statistic is reported.

"In terms of motivation, there was also a difference between the two groups: the authentic use of authentic materia ls (watching subtitled video clips) motivated students more than the non -authentic use of authentic materials (traditional teaching of the same subtitles)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.