Claims

Subtitled-video viewing outperformed traditional instruction on long-term vocabulary retention at a three-week delay

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group learning vocabulary through subtitled videos significantly outperformed the control group on the delayed post-test administered three weeks later. → Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad 2016

Evidence

Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad 2016

Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad. (2016). Short-term and Long-term Retention of Vocabulary through Authentic Subtitled Videos. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.5p.14

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t test on delayed post-test scores of the same 18-per-group sample; experimental mean 13.11 vs control mean 11.83, mean difference -1.278. The article reports "the difference is statistically significant, t (34) = -2.148".

"It shows that the difference is statistically significant, t (34) = -2.148, at p < .05, 2-tailed. However, this time the experimental group that had a slightly better performance."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.