Authoring tools have mainly targeted the pedagogical model (81.82% of studies) and domain model (75.76%), while no included study addressed all four classic ITS components¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The pedagogical model and domain model were the ITS components most targeted by authoring tools, with student and interface models far less addressed. → Diego Dermeval 2018 q3 i? None of the 33 studies addressed all four classic ITS components, which the review frames as a research opportunity. → Diego Dermeval 2018 (2)

Evidence¶

Diego Dermeval 2018¶

Diego Dermeval, Ranilson Paiva, Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Julita Vassileva, Daniel Borges. (2018). Authoring Tools for Designing Intelligent Tutoring Systems: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0157-9

q3 · i? · review · r3

RQ1 categorisation of the 33 included studies against Woolf's four ITS components. The review reports the pedagogical model at "81.82%; 27 studies" and domain model at "75.75%; 25 studies", with student and interface models much lower; a study could meet more than one component.

"Most of the papers use authoring tools to design the Pedagogical model of ITS (81.82%; 27 studies) and Domain model (75.75%; 25 studies), followed by Student model (18.18%; 6 studies)"

Diego Dermeval 2018 (2)¶

q3 · i? · review · r3

RQ1 analysis of component coverage combinations. The review states that "none of them addressed all four classic ITS components", with four papers covering domain, pedagogical and interface models and one covering domain, pedagogical and student models.

"Among all 33 studies, none of them addressed all four classic ITS components."

Discussion¶

ITS authoring tools have mainly targeted design before students' instruction, but works also address authoring during and/or post-instruction relying on human and artificial intelligence — related

Page metadata

Field	Value
`status`	`review`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-10-27`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.