MI Write's automated feedback is most useful to students when it supplements, not replaces, teacher feedback¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? MI Write's feedback was most useful to students when it supplemented rather than replaced teacher feedback. → Ruggiero 2023

Evidence¶

Ruggiero 2023¶

Ruggiero, R., Fox, L., & Shoji, M. (2023). Implementing MI Write in the Classroom. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/implementing-mi-write-in-the-classroom

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

Key finding from the MI Write implementation study in grades 7 and 8 English language arts classrooms: automated feedback works best "when it supplements, not replaces, teacher feedback."

"MI Write's feedback is most useful to students when it supplements, not replaces, teacher feedback."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Some students struggled to use Ecree's and MI Write's automated feedback — related
• A 2021–2022 study examined teachers' and students' use of MI Write and its impact on student and teacher outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
• More than half of surveyed teachers agreed Ecree was useful for improving students' writing, but some students may be overwhelmed by the feedback — related
• Students view AI videos as appropriate for simple, visualizable, and supplemental learning contexts but inappropriate for complex, subjective, or interactive ones — a broader claim this one bears on
• Regular and tailored support helped teachers integrate Ecree and MI Write into their teaching — related
• Teachers found Ecree and MI Write useful for their writing instruction and for helping students improve their writing — related