A 2021–2022 study examined teachers' and students' use of MI Write and its impact on student and teacher outcomes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? During the 2021–2022 school year, a study was designed and conducted to examine teachers' and students' use of MI Write and the tool's impact on student and teacher outcomes. → Lindsay Fox 2023
Evidence¶
Lindsay Fox 2023¶
Lindsay Fox, Marykate Zukiewicz. (2023). Study Methods for Briefs about MI Write Research Findings. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/study-methods-for-briefs-about-mi-write-research-findings
q1 · i? · design · r?
Descriptive statement from the publication's summary page about the study's timing and subject; the page prints no findings, sample sizes, or effect sizes, only that the study examined use of the tool and its impacts.
"This summary provides details about a study of MI Write, an automated writing feedback tool, which took place during the 2021–2022 school year."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- MI Write's automated feedback is most useful to students when it supplements, not replaces, teacher feedback — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The Ecree study examined teachers' and students' use of the tool and its impact on student and teacher outcomes during the 2021-2022 school year — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Teachers found Ecree and MI Write useful for their writing instruction and for helping students improve their writing — related
- Monthly coaching sessions helped teachers use and integrate MI Write with their instruction — related
- Teachers used Ecree less than intended, and some reported they did not have enough time to learn it and integrate it with instruction — related
- Teachers and students found Ecree easy to use and helpful for improving writing — related
- Ecree likely improved the quality of students' writing, especially for students with less advanced writing skills at the start of the school year — related
- More than half of surveyed teachers agreed Ecree was useful for improving students' writing, but some students may be overwhelmed by the feedback — related
- About half of surveyed students agreed Ecree was easy to use and helped improve their writing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mi-write-study-examined-use-and-impact |
title |
A 2021–2022 study examined teachers' and students' use of MI Write and its impact on student and teacher outcomes |
description |
A 2021–2022 study examined teachers' and students' use of MI Write and its impact on student and teacher outcomes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lindsay-fox-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.