Claims

Automaticity of handwriting predicts orthographic skills even when visual-motor integration is included in the model

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The association between handwriting automaticity and orthographic skills remained significant after visual-motor integration was added to the SEM model. → Wicki 2014

Evidence

Wicki 2014

Wicki, Werner; Hurschler Lichtsteiner, Sibylle; Saxer Geiger, Andrea; Müller, Marianne (2014). Handwriting fluency in children. Swiss Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000127

q3 · i? · associational · r2

SEM analysis in the same sample of 93 fourth graders showed the automaticity–orthographic association "remained significant" after including visual-motor integration, which was itself a predictor of orthographic skills.

"The latter association remained significant even when visual-motor integration, which also proved to be a predictor of orthographic skills, was included in the model."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id automaticity-predicts-orthographic-skills
title Automaticity of handwriting predicts orthographic skills even when visual-motor integration is included in the model
description Automaticity of handwriting predicts orthographic skills even when visual-motor integration is included in the model
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — wicki-2014

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.