The autonomy support–structure relationship is moderated by data collection method and school level¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The strength of the autonomy support–structure relationship differs by data collection method and school level. → Alexandra Patzak 2025

Evidence¶

Alexandra Patzak 2025¶

Alexandra Patzak, Xiaorong Zhang. (2025). Blending Teacher Autonomy Support and Provision of Structure in the Classroom for Optimal Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Moderation analyses in the meta-analysis tested data collection method (teacher report, student report, observation), school level, school subject, and cultural individualism as moderators of the autonomy support–structure correlation. The article reports the relationship "was moderated by the data collec- tion method and school level" and appears universal across contexts.

"This relationship was moderated by the data collec- tion method and school level and appears to be universal."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The choice of online versus offline measures of SRL moderates the strength of the relationship between SRL processes and achievement — related
• Publication year, publication type, and grade level moderate the strength of job satisfaction–performance associations — related