Claims

Publication year, publication type, and grade level moderate the strength of job satisfaction–performance associations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Effect sizes increased over publication year for general teacher-student interactions (β = 0.01, p < 0.001) and decreased for turnover intentions; published studies showed stronger associations for instructional support (β = 0.18) and general interactions (β = 0.09). → Wartenberg 2023 q2 i? Grade level moderated associations with instructional support (QM = 14.68) and general interactions (QM = 50.94), with weaker general-interaction effects in primary school samples. → Wartenberg 2023 (2)

Evidence

Wartenberg 2023

Wartenberg, G., Aldrup, K., Grund, S., & Klusmann, U. (2023). Satisfied and High Performing? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Correlates of Teachers' Job Satisfaction. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09831-4

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-regression models on the pooled effect sizes, with moderators entered in separate models. Publication year and publication type emerged as significant moderators; the authors caution that some analyses were based on a very small number of effect sizes.

"Results from meta-regression analyses revealed a significant increase in effect size over time for the relationship between job satisfaction and general teacher-student interactions (β = 0.01, p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in effect size over time for the relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intentions"

Wartenberg 2023 (2)

Wartenberg, G., Aldrup, K., Grund, S., & Klusmann, U. (2023). Satisfied and High Performing? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Correlates of Teachers' Job Satisfaction. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09831-4

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup meta-regressions by grade level taught. General teacher-student interaction effects were weaker in primary school samples (β = − 0.37, p < 0.001) compared to mixed samples; the authors note mixed-grade studies relied solely on teacher self-reports.

"Results suggested that the relationships between teachers' job satisfaction and both instructional support (Q M = 14.68, p = 0.001) and general teacher-student interactions (Q M = 50.94, p < 0.001) varied depending on the grade level taught"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id moderators-of-job-satisfaction-effect-sizes
title Publication year, publication type, and grade level moderate the strength of job satisfaction–performance associations
description Publication year, publication type, and grade level moderate the strength of job satisfaction–performance associations
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — wartenberg-2023, wartenberg-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.