Claims

Teacher autonomy support is associated with students' emotional engagement, playing a complementary role to structure

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Autonomy support was associated with emotional engagement, a complementary role relative to structure. → Hospel 2016

Evidence

Hospel 2016

Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001

q3 · i? · associational · r?

In the same multilevel study of 744 ninth-grade students in 51 classes, autonomy support provided at the classroom level was associated with emotional engagement; the article describes this as "a complementary role" to structure. No effect size is printed in the available text.

"Autonomy support has a complementary role as it was associated with emotional engagement."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id autonomy-support-associated-emotional-engagement
title Teacher autonomy support is associated with students' emotional engagement, playing a complementary role to structure
description Teacher autonomy support is associated with students' emotional engagement, playing a complementary role to structure
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hospel-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.