Claims

Autonomy-supportive training programs are overall effective, with a weighted effect size of 0.63 across 19 studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Training programs designed to help people support the autonomy of others were overall effective with a weighted effect size of 0.63. → Su 2011

Evidence

Su 2011

Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs Designed to Support Autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

The article's meta-analysis synthesized 19 independent studies with 20 effect sizes using Hunter–Schmidt methods, with effect sizes weighted by sample size and corrected for artifacts. It found the training programs were "overall, effective with a weighted effect size of 0.63."

"A meta-analysis of the findings from 19 studies with 20 effect sizes showed that the training programs were, overall, effective with a weighted effect size of 0.63."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id autonomy-support-training-effective-d63
title Autonomy-supportive training programs are overall effective, with a weighted effect size of 0.63 across 19 studies
description Autonomy-supportive training programs are overall effective, with a weighted effect size of 0.63 across 19 studies
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — su-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.