Claims

More effective autonomy-support training programs trained multiple elements of autonomy support

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Relatively more effective intervention programs were structured to train multiple elements of autonomy support. → Su 2011

Evidence

Su 2011

Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Intervention Programs Designed to Support Autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analyses of the meta-analytic effect size compared program subcategories. Programs "structured in ways that trained multiple elements of autonomy support" were relatively more effective; no effect size for this moderator contrast is printed in the available text.

"Moderator analyses of the overall effect size showed that the relatively more effective intervention programs were structured in ways that trained multiple elements of autonomy support"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id multiple-elements-moderator-autonomy-training
title More effective autonomy-support training programs trained multiple elements of autonomy support
description More effective autonomy-support training programs trained multiple elements of autonomy support
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — su-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.