Claims

Average effect sizes for the most relevant teaching strategies range from 0.01 to 1.68, with a median of 0.42.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The 122 average effect sizes included in summaries of the most relevant teaching strategies ranged from 0.01 to 1.68, with a median of 0.42. → Oxman 2024

Evidence

Oxman 2024

Oxman, Andrew D.; Nsangi, Allen; Martínez García, Laura; Kaseje, Margaret; Samsó Jofra, Laura; Semakula, Daniel; Munthe-Kaas, Heather; Rosenbaum, Sarah E. (2024). The effects of teaching strategies on learning to think critically in primary and secondary schools: an overview of systematic reviews. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.158087.1

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The overview authors categorised the size of effects from little or no effect to a large effect. The 122 average effect sizes included in their summaries of the most relevant teaching strategies ranged from 0.01 to 1.68, with a median of 0.42.

"The 122 average effect sizes that we included in the summaries ranged from 0.01 to 1.68, median 0.42 ( Figure 3)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.