AwD showed significant set size effects in uncued conditions alongside difficulty effects, unlike controls¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 In uncued conditions the AwD showed significant effects of set size, difficulty and a difficulty by set size interaction, while controls showed no main effect of difficulty or interaction. → Moores 2011
Evidence¶
Moores 2011¶
Moores, E., Cassim, R. and Talcott, J.B. (2011). Adults with dyslexia exhibit large effects of crowding, increased dependence on cues, and detrimental effects of distractors in visual search tasks. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.005
q2 · i3 · causal · r1
Two-factor ANOVAs on set size eight crowded vs sixteen displays in uncued conditions. Both groups showed significant set size effects (η2p =.37 controls; η2p =.44 AwD), but only AwD showed significant difficulty (η2p =.44) and difficulty by set size interaction (η2p =.50) effects.
"In uncued conditions, both the controls (F 1,15 =8.93, p<.01, η2p =.37) and the AwD (F 1,14 =10.89, p<.005, η2p =.44) showed significant effects of set size. The AwD also showed a significant effect of difficulty (F 1,14 =11.15, p<.005, η2p =.44) and a difficulty by set size interaction (F 1,14 =13.81, p<.005, η2p =.50)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Adults with dyslexia show disproportionately reduced discrimination accuracy in crowded displays compared to controls — related
- AwD required significantly longer calibrated display durations than controls despite attempts to equate overall accuracy — related
- Adults with dyslexia use pre-cues to enhance discrimination accuracy, with pre-cued performance exceeding both post-cued and uncued conditions — related
- The four-way interaction between cue, group, display type and difficulty was significant, with group differences largest for uncued crowded stimuli — related
- Pre-cues and post-cues eliminate set size effects for controls but not for adults with dyslexia — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
awd-uncued-setsize-difficulty-effects |
title |
AwD showed significant set size effects in uncued conditions alongside difficulty effects, unlike controls |
description |
AwD showed significant set size effects in uncued conditions alongside difficulty effects, unlike controls |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — moores-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.