Claims

Posttest creativity scores differed between the experimental and control groups in favor of the experimental group, though the text and Table 6 print conflicting statistics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's posttest creativity scores exceeded the control group's, per the Mann Whitney U test reported in Table 6 (z=2.65, p<0.01), although the running text prints z=2.55, p>0.05. → Ayşen Ertürkler and Hakan Bağcı 2019

Evidence

Ayşen Ertürkler and Hakan Bağcı 2019

Ayşen Ertürkler and Hakan Bağcı. (2019). The effect of enriched creative activities program supported with Aytürk technique on creativity level in music courses. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3692

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Mann Whitney U comparison of posttest creativity scores between the 18-student experimental group and 15-student control group after the 10-week program. The text reports "a meaningful difference in favor of the Experimental group"; Table 6 prints u=62.00, z=2.65, p<0.01.

"A meaningful difference in favor of the Experimental group was found between the Creativity posttest scores of students in the Experimental and Control Groups (z=2.55, p>0.05) (Table 6)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.