Baseline cognitive abilities do not significantly predict the size of ACT-related speech-in-noise improvement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In a multiple regression within the experimental group, no baseline cognitive measure significantly predicted training-related SIN improvement; only age was marginally associated (p = 0.050). → Ockelmann 2025
Evidence¶
Ockelmann 2025¶
Ockelmann, J., Scherpiet, S., Stropahl, M. & Giroud, N. (2025). Personalized and gamified auditory-cognitive training improves naturalistic speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults with hearing loss. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00369-4
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Multiple regression within the experimental group (EG-HL) predicting training-related SIN comprehension improvement from baseline PSTM, WM, FA, DA, age, PTA, and hearing aid use. "No significant associations were observed" for the cognitive predictors, PTA, or hearing aid use; age was marginally associated (β = 0.0234, p = 0.050).
"No significant associations were observed for PSTM ( β = 0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0004, 0.0013], p = 0.294), WM ( β = −0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0015, 0.0005], p = 0.324), FA ( β = −0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0013, 0.0003], p = 0.178), DA (β = 0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0002, 0.0012], p = 0.166)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- General Cognitive Ability — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Gamified personalized auditory-cognitive training improves naturalistic speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults with hearing loss relative to an active control group — related
- Cognitive performance shows a pooled association of r = .31 with speech-in-noise perception across adult unaided listeners — related
- Visual enhancement is not significantly associated with hearing level, age, visual working memory or processing speed, and learning rate in speechreading training is not significantly associated with those or with hearing aid use or training intensity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
baseline-cognition-does-not-predict-act-benefit |
title |
Baseline cognitive abilities do not significantly predict the size of ACT-related speech-in-noise improvement |
description |
Baseline cognitive abilities do not significantly predict the size of ACT-related speech-in-noise improvement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ockelmann-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.