Claims

Baseline cognitive abilities do not significantly predict the size of ACT-related speech-in-noise improvement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In a multiple regression within the experimental group, no baseline cognitive measure significantly predicted training-related SIN improvement; only age was marginally associated (p = 0.050). → Ockelmann 2025

Evidence

Ockelmann 2025

Ockelmann, J., Scherpiet, S., Stropahl, M. & Giroud, N. (2025). Personalized and gamified auditory-cognitive training improves naturalistic speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults with hearing loss. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00369-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Multiple regression within the experimental group (EG-HL) predicting training-related SIN comprehension improvement from baseline PSTM, WM, FA, DA, age, PTA, and hearing aid use. "No significant associations were observed" for the cognitive predictors, PTA, or hearing aid use; age was marginally associated (β = 0.0234, p = 0.050).

"No significant associations were observed for PSTM ( β = 0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0004, 0.0013], p = 0.294), WM ( β = −0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0015, 0.0005], p = 0.324), FA ( β = −0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0013, 0.0003], p = 0.178), DA (β = 0.0005, 95% CI [ − 0.0002, 0.0012], p = 0.166)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id baseline-cognition-does-not-predict-act-benefit
title Baseline cognitive abilities do not significantly predict the size of ACT-related speech-in-noise improvement
description Baseline cognitive abilities do not significantly predict the size of ACT-related speech-in-noise improvement
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ockelmann-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.