Training sequence accuracy improved in both groups at Post, but only the BCI-SRF group retained a significant improvement at follow-up relative to Pre¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Both groups improved training sequence accuracy Post vs Pre, but the FU vs Pre improvement was significant only in the BCI-SRF group. → Yuan Liu 2024

Evidence¶

Yuan Liu 2024¶

Yuan Liu, Shuaifei Huang, Weiguo Xu, Zhuang Wang & Dong Ming. (2024). An fMRI study on the generalization of motor learning after brain actuated supernumerary robot training. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00294-y

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mixed-design ANOVA of training sequence accuracy showed a significant TIME × GROUP interaction (F(2,34)=4.794, p=0.0147), but "no significant differences at Post and FU among 2 groups" (Post p=0.8375; FU p=0.3342). Post-hoc tests showed the FU vs Pre difference was significant only in the BCI-SRF group.

"Post-hoc tests revealed a signi ficant increase not only for the BCI-SRF group (Post vs Pre:p = 0.0001) but also for the finger training group (Post vs Pre:p = 0.0045). However, improvement in FU vs Pre was found only in the BCI-SRF group (FU vs Pre:p = 0.0003), but not for the finger training group (FU vs Pre:p =0 . 4 1 8 )"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• BCI-SRF training produces a substantially larger improvement in novel control-sequence accuracy than inborn finger training, with the BCI-SRF group's improvement 350% of the Finger group's — related
• BCI-SRF training increased causal effects along the SM_cortex–cerebellar–thalamus loop and enhanced bidirectional frontal-parietal causal interaction relative to finger training — related