BCI-SRF training produces a substantially larger improvement in novel control-sequence accuracy than inborn finger training, with the BCI-SRF group's improvement 350% of the Finger group's¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? After 4-week training, the BCI-SRF group improved control sequence accuracy significantly more than the Finger group, with an improvement ratio of 350%. → Yuan Liu 2024
q3 i? The TIME × GROUP interaction effect on control sequence accuracy was significant (F(2,34)=6.318, p=0.0046). → Yuan Liu 2024
Evidence¶
Yuan Liu 2024¶
Yuan Liu, Shuaifei Huang, Weiguo Xu, Zhuang Wang & Dong Ming. (2024). An fMRI study on the generalization of motor learning after brain actuated supernumerary robot training. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00294-y
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Mixed-design ANOVA of control sequence accuracy at Pre, Post, and FU in 20 healthy right-handed participants randomized to BCI-SRF or Finger training. "Significant difference in CS score (Post, p = 0.0016; FU, p = 0.0139)" was observed between groups, with the BCI-SRF group improving from 0.815 ± 0.08 to 0.919 ± 0.06 and the reported improvement ratio being 350%.
"As i g n ificant TIME × GROUP interaction effect was found (mixed- design ANOVA, F (2, 34) = 6.318, p = 0.0046) in the CS performance. Significant difference in CS score (Post, p = 0.0016; FU, p = 0.0139) was witnessed at Post and FU among 2 groups"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Training sequence accuracy improved in both groups at Post, but only the BCI-SRF group retained a significant improvement at follow-up relative to Pre — related
- BCI-SRF training increased functional connectivity between the left primary sensorimotor cortex and left middle frontal gyrus, and between right-hemisphere intrahemispheric and interhemispheric sensorimotor regions, relative to finger training — related
- BCI-SRF training increased causal effects along the SM_cortex–cerebellar–thalamus loop and enhanced bidirectional frontal-parietal causal interaction relative to finger training — related
- Four specific sensorimotor connections showed significant TIME × GROUP interaction effects, with post-training increases only in the BCI-SRF group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.