Claims

The strength of between-domain relations varies by emotion type, with pride strongest and enjoyment and anxiety weakest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Enjoyment and anxiety showed the weakest, and pride the strongest, between-domain relations in both grade-level samples, though the overall differences were weak. → Goetz 2006

Evidence

Goetz 2006

Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2006). Between- and Within-Domain Relations of Students' Academic Emotions. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Multilevel analysis of between-domain homogeneity per emotion construct in the two grade-level samples. "Enjoyment and anxiety showed the weakest" relations and pride the strongest; selected pairwise differences were statistically significant but the authors characterize them as relatively weak.

"Enjoyment and anxiety showed the weakest, and pride the strongest, between-domains relations in both samples. However, all of the differences were weak, even though some were statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.