Claims

The strength of within-domain relations among academic emotions differs considerably across school subjects, strongest in mathematics and weakest in German

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within-domain homogeneity h(e) ranked mathematics highest, followed by physics, English, and German, with nearly all domain differences statistically significant in both grade levels. → Goetz 2006

Evidence

Goetz 2006

Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2006). Between- and Within-Domain Relations of Students' Academic Emotions. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Multilevel analysis of emotion homogeneity within each of four domains in both grade-level samples. "the strongest within-domain relations were found for mathematics" and German was by far the weakest; all h(e) differences were significant (p < .05) except physics–English in Grade 11.

"In both samples, the strongest within-domain relations were found for mathematics, followed by physics, English, and German. Within-domain relations in German were by far the weakest."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.