Claims

Early bilinguals outperform monolinguals on the hard items of the Symbol Math task in Experiment 1

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 In Experiment 1, a bilingualism effect on Symbol Math performance appeared only on the hard items (ηp² = 0.08). → Mielicki 2017

Evidence

Mielicki 2017

Mielicki, M. K., Kacinik, N. A., & Wiley, J. (2017). Bilingualism and symbolic abstraction: Implications for algebra learning. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.002

q3 · i2 · associational · r2

Experiment 1 with 61 undergraduates (29 bilingual, 32 monolingual) used an ANCOVA with basic math as covariate on Symbol Math scores at three difficulty levels. The follow-up test found the bilingual advantage "onlyonthehard items,F(1,58)=4.87,p =0.03,ηp 2 =0.08", a printed effect size of ηp² = 0.08.

"Follow-up tests for eachlevelofdifficultyrevealedabilingualismeffectonlyonthehard items,F(1,58)=4.87,p =0.03,ηp 2 =0.08(seeFig.3)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id bilingual-advantage-hard-symbol-math-exp1
title Early bilinguals outperform monolinguals on the hard items of the Symbol Math task in Experiment 1
description Early bilinguals outperform monolinguals on the hard items of the Symbol Math task in Experiment 1
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mielicki-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.