Claims

EOL relative accuracy is reliably higher when correlated with a binary recall criterion than with a trials-to-learn criterion

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 In Experiment 1, gamma was reliably higher against the binary criterion than the TTL criterion, but the article describes the effect size as very small (d =. 1 4, below d = 0.2). → Jemstedt 2017

Evidence

Jemstedt 2017

Jemstedt, A., Kubik, V., & Jönsson, F. U. (2017). What moderates the accuracy of ease of learning judgments? Metacognition and Learning, 12, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9172-3

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Experiment 1 within-group analysis of EOL accuracy by criterion measure found the binary criterion outperformed the TTL criterion, F(1, 30) = 9.60, p = .004; the article states the effect size was "very small, d =. 1 4", a negligible magnitude, and the direction was unexpected.

"gamma was reliably higher when EOL judgments were correlated with the binary criterion (M =. 4 8 4 ,SD= .13) than to the TTL criterion ( M =. 4 6 5 ,SD =. 1 4 ) ,F(1, 30) = 9.60, p = .004, mean difference = .019, 95% CI = [.01, .03]. The latter finding was unexpected as correlations in most cases benefit from scales that can take a larger range of values (TTL criterion) than if it is binary. However, the main effect of criterion measure on EOL accuracy was in terms of the effect size very small, d =. 1 4."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id binary-criterion-higher-eol-accuracy-than-ttl-criterion
title EOL relative accuracy is reliably higher when correlated with a binary recall criterion than with a trials-to-learn criterion
description EOL relative accuracy is reliably higher when correlated with a binary recall criterion than with a trials-to-learn criterion
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
recheck_by 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jemstedt-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.