Claims

Using scientists' biographies in physics teaching raises the level of the emotional component of learners' cognitive activity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a year-long quasi-experiment with grade 7-9 learners, the experimental group taught with biographic material showed a different distribution of emotional-component levels than the control group at post-test, confirming the alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 significance level. → Korsun 2017

Evidence

Korsun 2017

Korsun, I. (2017). Expediency of Study of the Scientists' Biographies in Physics Course. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 229-244. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_2_15.pdf

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pedagogical experiment in grades 7-9 (five control classes, 122 learners; five experimental classes, 120 learners) during 2015-2016, with pre- and post-test questionnaires. Pearson's criterion analysis at significance level 0.05 confirmed the alternative hypothesis; no effect size is printed. Post-test percentages showed EG low 15.0 vs CG 26.0 and EG high 31.0 vs CG 24.0.

"Thus, analysis of pedagogical experiment confirmed the alternative hypothesis: the difference between theoretical and empirical values of Pearson's criterion has occurred with not accidental, but with essential reasons (implementation of the method of study of the scientists' biographies)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.