Learners do not receive enough information about the creators of physics laws (pre-test finding)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Pre-test questioning showed that learners studying physics laws do not receive enough information about the scientists who created them. → Korsun 2017
Evidence¶
Korsun 2017¶
Korsun, I. (2017). Expediency of Study of the Scientists' Biographies in Physics Course. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 229-244. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_2_15.pdf
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pre-test questionnaire administered at the start of the academic year in both control and experimental groups of the pedagogical experiment; the article reports this gap descriptively with no effect size or test statistic.
"Learners study the different physics laws. But learners not receive the enough information about the creators of physics laws (results of pre -test)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.