Claims

Evolution is the most investigated topic and text-reading the most common intervention type in biology conceptual change research

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Evolution was the most common biological topic in conceptual change interventions, followed by photosynthesis. → Aleknavičiūtė 2023 q3 i? Text-reading interventions were the most common type, and most of the texts used were refutational texts. → Aleknavičiūtė 2023 (2)

Evidence

Aleknavičiūtė 2023

Aleknavičiūtė, V., Lehtinen, E., & Södervik, I. (2023). Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Qualitative synthesis of the 96 included studies' topics: evolution leads (28 papers in Table 4), and "The second most frequently investigated topic was ‘photosynthesis’" (15 papers), followed by respiration, ecological concepts, genetics and circulatory systems.

"The most common biological topic in conceptual change interventions was ‘evolution’ (Table 4)."

Aleknavičiūtė 2023 (2)

Aleknavičiūtė, V., Lehtinen, E., & Södervik, I. (2023). Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Intervention-type coding across the 96 studies: "The most common intervention type was a text-reading intervention (25 studies)", of which 19 were refutational or conceptual change texts; other types included hands-on activities, simulations and games, concept maps, analogies and writing.

"The most common intervention type was a text-reading intervention (25 studies). More specifically, most of the texts used were refutational texts (19 studies out of 25)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id biology-cc-topics-and-intervention-types
title Evolution is the most investigated topic and text-reading the most common intervention type in biology conceptual change research
description Evolution is the most investigated topic and text-reading the most common intervention type in biology conceptual change research
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — aleknavičiūtė-2023, aleknavičiūtė-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.