Evolution is the most investigated topic and text-reading the most common intervention type in biology conceptual change research¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Evolution was the most common biological topic in conceptual change interventions, followed by photosynthesis. → Aleknavičiūtė 2023
q3 i? Text-reading interventions were the most common type, and most of the texts used were refutational texts. → Aleknavičiūtė 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Aleknavičiūtė 2023¶
Aleknavičiūtė, V., Lehtinen, E., & Södervik, I. (2023). Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Qualitative synthesis of the 96 included studies' topics: evolution leads (28 papers in Table 4), and "The second most frequently investigated topic was ‘photosynthesis’" (15 papers), followed by respiration, ecological concepts, genetics and circulatory systems.
"The most common biological topic in conceptual change interventions was ‘evolution’ (Table 4)."
Aleknavičiūtė 2023 (2)¶
Aleknavičiūtė, V., Lehtinen, E., & Södervik, I. (2023). Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Intervention-type coding across the 96 studies: "The most common intervention type was a text-reading intervention (25 studies)", of which 19 were refutational or conceptual change texts; other types included hands-on activities, simulations and games, concept maps, analogies and writing.
"The most common intervention type was a text-reading intervention (25 studies). More specifically, most of the texts used were refutational texts (19 studies out of 25)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Biology conceptual change interventions have been conducted at all educational levels, most commonly with upper secondary students, with a median sample of 78 participants — related
- The most effective biology conceptual change interventions dealt with more simplified phenomena such as the cardiovascular system — related
- Conceptual change interventions in biology produce large effects on conceptual understanding compared with traditional teaching, with refutational text the most effective single intervention type — related
- Effect sizes of biology conceptual change interventions were strongly influenced by sample size and publication bias — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
biology-cc-topics-and-intervention-types |
title |
Evolution is the most investigated topic and text-reading the most common intervention type in biology conceptual change research |
description |
Evolution is the most investigated topic and text-reading the most common intervention type in biology conceptual change research |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — aleknavičiūtė-2023, aleknavičiūtė-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.