Claims

Effect sizes of biology conceptual change interventions were strongly influenced by sample size and publication bias

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q4
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? The review found effect sizes were strongly influenced by the number of participants in the samples and by publication bias. → Aleknavičiūtė 2023

Evidence

Aleknavičiūtė 2023

Aleknavičiūtė, V., Lehtinen, E., & Södervik, I. (2023). Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analytic finding from the review of 33 studies: the authors report that "the effect sizes were strongly influenced by the number of participants in the samples, as well as publication bias". Moderator analyses classified samples as small (below 60), moderate (61–120) and large (above 121).

"It was found that the effect sizes were strongly influenced by the number of participants in the samples, as well as publication bias."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id biology-cc-effect-sizes-sample-size-publication-bias
title Effect sizes of biology conceptual change interventions were strongly influenced by sample size and publication bias
description Effect sizes of biology conceptual change interventions were strongly influenced by sample size and publication bias
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — aleknavičiūtė-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.