Claims

Students identified peer interaction and writing outlet/access as the most positive features of the e-course tools

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The most frequently cited positive feature was fostering interaction with peer readers (32%), followed by finding an outlet and access to writing (30%). → Alharbi 2015

Evidence

Alharbi 2015

Alharbi, M. (2015). Effects of Blackboard’s Discussion Boards, Blogs and Wikis on Effective Integration and Development of Literacy Skills in EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p111

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Part C open-ended responses categorized into six features showed interaction with readers (31–32%) and outlet/access for writing (29–30%) as the top two, followed by communicative online writing (17%) and detailed topic reading/writing (13%).

"The results above indicate that the informants felt the most positive about interaction with readers (31%), then finding an outlet for their writing (29%), and writing in English on the Internet."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.