Claims

EFL students in the blended Blackboard course reported positive attitudes toward using discussion boards, blogs and wikis for integrated reading/writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants agreed the online course tools fostered peer interaction, helped them attend to sentence and paragraph structure, and helped them revise, edit and proofread published material. → Alharbi 2015 q2 i? Participants enjoyed using the tools, felt comfortable with them, and believed the tools motivated interactive reading and writing. → Alharbi 2015 (2)

Evidence

Alharbi 2015

Alharbi, M. (2015). Effects of Blackboard’s Discussion Boards, Blogs and Wikis on Effective Integration and Development of Literacy Skills in EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p111

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Part A of the attitude scale (administered only to the experimental group, n = 30) showed agreement that the tools fostered peer interaction, helped with sentence/paragraph structure, and supported revision and proofreading of blog and wiki content.

"These responses indicate that the participants in the experimental group have an overall positive attitude towards the usefulness of the interactive e-course tools for literacy development."

Alharbi 2015 (2)

Alharbi, M. (2015). Effects of Blackboard’s Discussion Boards, Blogs and Wikis on Effective Integration and Development of Literacy Skills in EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p111

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Part B of the attitude scale showed participants enjoyed the tools, felt comfortable responding to threads and publishing blogs/wikis, and agreed the tools motivated interactive reading and writing (e.g., 56.67% SA + 43.33% A on motivation).

"These results indicate that the participants’ attitudes toward integrated reading and writing in the e-learning environment using discussion boards, blogs and wikis, f enjoy these e-course tools, and feel comfort with using them."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.