Saudi EFL preparatory students taught through a blended e-learning approach for 8 weeks outperformed a traditionally taught control group on an achievement test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After 8 teaching weeks, the experimental (e-learning) group performed better than the control group, with a statistically significant difference between paired samples (p=.000). → Intakhab Alam Khan 2016

Evidence¶

Intakhab Alam Khan 2016¶

Intakhab Alam Khan. (2016). Effectiveness of E-learning for the Teaching of English: A Study of Comparative Strategies. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.3p.125

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment at KAU Community College: two parallel classes taught by routine method versus e-learning mode for 8 weeks, then tested with a self-developed achievement test covering listening, reading, grammar and vocabulary. The printed means were 3.66 (control) and 4.48 (experimental), described as "a difference in mean values of the two groups".

"The mean value of controlled group is 3.66, but the mean value of experimental is 4.48 which show that there is a difference in mean values of the two groups of the sample used for the study."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AI-mediated language instruction produces significantly greater English learning achievement gains than traditional instruction among EFL learners — related
• Both ITS and traditionally instructed groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related