Both ITS and traditionally instructed groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Paired t-tests showed a significant difference between pre- and post-test scores for both the control and experimental groups (p < 0.05). → Karaci 2018
Evidence¶
Karaci 2018¶
Karaci, A., Akyuz, H. I., Bilgici, G., & Arici, N. (2018). Effects of Web-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems on Academic Achievement and Retention. International Journal of Computer Applications, 181(16). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED588768
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Paired t-test of pre-/post-test scores in the 80-student controlled experiment. Control means rose from 3.62 to 16.26 and experimental means from 3.42 to 20.66, with "a significant difference between the mean pre - and post-test scores of both groups".
"Table 3 shows a significant difference between the mean pre - and post-test scores of both groups after intervention (p < 0.05). In other words, the achievement level of both groups was higher after instruction."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Geometric Reasoning — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Both ABSL and traditionally taught groups showed statistically significant pre-test to post-test achievement gains in probability — related
- Both the graphic-novel and traditional-activity groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test, with a larger gain in the experimental group — related
- Sixth-grade EFL students taught through multiple intelligences activities showed a statistically significant pre-test to post-test improvement in essay writing scores — related
- Undergraduate students taught organic chemistry with an analogy instructional strategy achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught by traditional lecture methods — related
- The tablet e-textbook experimental group significantly outperformed the traditionally taught control group on the post-test — related
- At post-test, the multiple intelligences group significantly outperformed the traditionally instructed control group on the writing test — related
- Year 4 pupils taught two-dimensional shape properties with Logo outperformed a traditionally taught control group on the post-test — related
- Pre-service teachers taught probability with the ABSL approach achieved significantly higher post-test scores than those taught with traditional methods — related
- Saudi EFL preparatory students taught through a blended e-learning approach for 8 weeks outperformed a traditionally taught control group on an achievement test — related
- Both groups improved significantly from pre test to post test, with a larger mean gain in the GeoGebra group — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Both groups improved significantly on the achievement test from pre-test to post-test, with the experimental group reaching a much higher post-test mean — related
- Both groups improved from pre-test to post-test, but the experiment group's within-group gains in mastery goal and achievement were larger than the control group's — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.