Claims

Blended learning produced higher post-achievement in third-grade science than traditional teaching, explaining 16.9% of variance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Third graders taught via blended learning scored significantly higher on the post-achievement test than those taught traditionally, with an eta-squared effect size of 16.9%. → Khader 2016

Evidence

Khader 2016

Nisreen Saleh Khader Khader. (2016). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Improving Students' Achievement in Third Grade's Science in Bani Kenana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126508

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 108 third graders (54 experimental, 54 control) taught the units and changes of the material and parts and functions of plants; two-way ANCOVA on post-test controlling for pretest. The F value was "(21.004), which is statistically significant at the level of statistical significance (α = 0.000)"; eta squared was 16.9%.

"The value of the calculated (P) is (21.004), which is statistically significant at the level of statistical significance (α = 0.000)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.